Golden Oaks Rehabilitation Center

Margie Wilson, a 95 year old charr and patient at Golden Oaks Rehabilitation Center located on the grounds of Marion General Hospital, is dealing with some difficult sequences after(prenominal) losing her son, Williams, this bygone week. Within the past five years, she has also had to deal with the temporary of her husband of 68 years, Earl, and another son who died in a repulse vehicle accident, Jacob. Margie is having a very difficult time victorious this completely in and is not feeling alone. She has come to the conclusion that she no careerlong wants to live her behavior alone.She wants to end her life and is postulationing that the one thing thats keeping her alive, her pace amazer, be disconnected. Two years ago Margie suffered a vegetable marrow attack that almost took her life, which resulted in her having the electronic pace cast offr implanted. The pacemaker keeps Margies heart rhythm at 100% pace, which is what keeps her alive. With all her family gone, she h as no rely to live anymore and is requesting that her pacemaker be removed so that she evoke be reunited with her family.Margie has spoken with Cindy Macklin, the Nursing Home Administrator, and has told her what she would like to happen. She has requested that Cindy call off Dr. Vigay, who is the cardiologist surgeon who originally implanted the pacemaker. Dr. Vigay was stunned because in the 20 years of his practice he has never had a request from his patents. He has pretty much declined her request and has asked that she allow time to get her past her current state of mind and back to normal. Margie is now extremely disruption and falld and is now requesting to see the Golden Oaks social worker, Jane Robison, MSW.Jane meets with Margie for more than an time of day discussing and exploring all her options. In this case, there atomic number 18 morals and conflicts involved. There be certain honourable, moral and legal conflicts that need to be determined. Morals atomic n umber 18 beliefs and values that conform to normal standards of what is refine and wrong and deal with great deals habits of conduct (www. ehow. com). The moral principles of ethics that are involved embroil Beneficence doing intelligent, demonstrating kindness, showing compassion, and helping others Nonmaleficence avoiding the infliction of harmJustice the duty to be white in the distribution of benefits and risks Autonomy recognizing an individuals right to make his or her own decisions The morals that are in conflict are nonmaleficence, justice and autonomy. The top priority of the doctors, nurses, social worker, and ethics committee is to make sure that nonmaleficence is not being implemented while considering Margies right to make her own decision about absent to live and the risks and benefits that could go along with Margies request to remove her pacemaker. The dilemma here consists of Margie wanting her doctor to assist with taking her life by removing her pacemake r.Margie has lost her require to live because of the loss of her family and wants to be with them. There are several ethical theories that play apart in this dilemma. Normative Ethics the attempt to determine what moral standards should be followed so that human behavior and conduct are chastely right (Pozgar, p 369). Consequential Ethics emphasizing that the morally right action is whatever action leads to the maximum balance of good over evil (Pozgar, p. 369). Utilitarian Ethics doing the greatest good for the most people (Pozgar, p. 370).Deontologic Ethics focusing on ones duties to others and others rights including singing the truth and keeping your promises (Pozgar, p. 371). As the ethics committee chairman, we do withstand that there is a dilemma here. We are all on the equal accord and have been informed with all the information about the case. Dr. Vigay, Jane Robison, Cindy Macklin, and I have all come together and presented all the information and accompaniments that we hold out about the dilemma to the members of the committee to ensure that no one was left over(p) out about any details of this dilemma.Dr. Vigay informed the committee that removing Margies pacemaker would violate the ethics principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. If he followed through with Margies request, he would be going against helping others, avoiding or causing harm to patients, and disregard the benefits and risks of Margie by performing the requested actions. Jane Robison has expressed that doing what Margie has requested would not be good for Margie nor her profession due to the ethics standards that are withheld for all the patients.She believes that with time Margie will have a change of heart and appreciate her life being spared. Cindy Macklin is in agreement with everyone else in not assisting Margie with taking her life due to overwhelming circumstances she has faced within the past some years. Therefore, after all the recommendations and suggestions from all involved and the members of the ethics committee, Margies request to have her pacemaker removed has been denied due to the all the ethical standards and the fact that it is not right to allow or assist anyone in taking their own life.