'Was Mary Bloody or Misunderstood Essay\r'

'bloody shame became queen regnant of England in 1553, after she kill Lady Jane Grey. address A, in the textbook, utters that â€Å"There were bonfires and tables in every anyey and wine and beer and ale”, this is an account from the diary of a Londoner at the time bloody shame became Queen, and so it is manikina trustworthy. bloody shame mistook this celebration to mean that the passel of England were glad they had a Catholic Queen on the throne. So she strict about(predicate) trying to flip over the country into a Catholic country. This did not settle well with the populace and caused many an(prenominal) Protestants to take an immediate disliking towards her. As bloody shame realised this she took to giving the finish penalty to as many heretics as she could. acknowledgment A, on the sheet, say that â€Å"Women at their marketing, men at their daily slew… all learned to know the sweet sapidity of give noticeing flesh.” This was create verbal ly by a historian in 1940 so it is not very reliable, stock-still it does show that a lot of burnings took place.\r\n root word D, on the sheet, is compose by D. Loades, a historian, in 1991 verbalize that â€Å"bloody shame soulally bears the responsibility for the death of close to 300 heretics, on the dot she also executed traitors much(prenominal) ruthlessly than either her father or her babe”A famous writer at the time, seat Foxe, wrote about bloody shame I. He said that uncomplete man, woman or child was spared from the cruel burnings at Mary’s hand. A section of his writing, including this breeding, is quoted in Source B; it was written in 1559, a year after Mary’s death, so it is more reliable than other sources. However charge though it was written around Mary’s time, John Foxe was a Protestant so the information could be bias.\r\nSource E, on the sheet, written by a historian in 1990, says â€Å"The Bishop of Winchester had urged Mary to burn the heretics, but it was Mary who insisted on continuing raze when it was obvious the cruel punishments were leading stack to sustainment the Protestants rather than turn to the Catholic religion.” If plenty weren’t listening and actually going against her, the Queen, then it would belike fork over annoyed her even more because she wouldn’t have had the control over the country she wanted. and then she might have increased the executions. Source F says that when Mary died â€Å"All the churches in London rang their bells and that iniquity bonfires were lit and tables placed in the street and mickle ate drank andmade merry.” This was written by a Londoner at the time Mary died so it is a reliable source, unless he might have been Protestant which could have made the account bias. Many people thought Mary deserved the name ‘ cover Mary’ but there was also people who thought she was beneficial misconstrue.\r\nSource A is M ary speaking to her council in 1555, so it is very reliable, when she began the normal executions â€Å"Concerning punishments of heretics, we hypothesise I ought to be done without rashness. The people must see that any condemned are do by fairly, so that they understand the truth.” I hold she was say that when they want to arrest mostbody, or execute them, they should confound reliable they have the right facts and make sure it is the right person. This might make people appreciate that she is being fair about who she arrests and why.\r\nWhen Mary hook up with Philip of Spain, who was Catholic, England helped Spain in the war against France. The result of the war was the injustice of the last place England owned on France-Calais. Now, historians mark that it was probably unavoidable, so that shows us that it was not Mary’s fault. This is a good example of how she was misunderstood because she was sole(prenominal) trying to help her husband’s count ry. Source D is about this and was written in 1994 so the time is not near, however by then people will have had more information about the events following the situation. So it is quite a effectual source. At the time of Mary’s death a poem was written about her:\r\nHer perfect life in all extremes\r\nHer patient heart did show\r\nFor in this ball she never found\r\nBut doleful years and woe\r\nThe poem is saying that Mary try to be kind and patient but she was yet repaid with unhappy days full of sorrow. It was written by an anonymous poet so it could be bias but it is written when she died so it is quite a effectual source but not totally trustworthy. Source C points out that Mary benefited the country greatly by reforming the tax system, the Army and the navy. This shows that Mary cared about the country and it’s welfare/condition so she wasn’t a abominable person to her people.\r\nSource E says â€Å"Lady Jane Grey and her husband were sentenced to death but Mary saved them and they were only executed after they were thought to be involved in Wyatt’s rebellion against Mary.” This source was written in 1964 by a historian so it is not useful for the time it was written but useful because the historian would have had all the facts, however the person could have been bias. The source shows that Mary was a kind person and she wanted to help a hero who was in trouble. Source B says that it wasn’t only Mary that killed people, in Essex â€Å"between 17 and 24 people were hanged each year for common theft.” This was written by a historian in 1976 so it is quite a reliable source however the historian could be bias on the put in of Mary and whether she was bloody or misunderstood. Looking at equal evidence for both sides of the argument, I think that Mary is bloody. I think this because she has killed so, so many people just because they had a various whimsey to her! Any person can take a dislike to som ebody if they have a completely different view to them.\r\nHowever it takes a horrible person to go so far as to kill nearly 300 people just to try and get everybody to agree with you. Even when she knew it wasn’t working, and she was just turning people against her, she carried on. She does have some good points †for instance reforming the tax system, the Army and the Navy †however she should be doing things like that because she was the queen and she had to have responsibilities. But taking it so far was just evil. When she realised that she was just turning people off from Catholicism and towards Protestantism she should have held back and tried to turn the country toward Catholicism in a different and less murderous way. Overall I think that Mary I deserves the name Bloody Mary and that she was a terrible queen.\r\n'