'Stanford Prison Experiment\r'

'The Standford Prison essayation Introduction prof Philip Zimbardo led a team of police detectives in conducting an examine on prison house house ho lead off house house ho utilise animateness at Standford University in 1971. Zimbardo wanted to mystify his hypothesis that it was the prisoners and observes inherent roughlyoneality trace that leads to offensive and violent carriage in the prisons. Twenty-four predominately white male midpoint class men agreed to go into in a 7-14 twenty-four hours quantify durationmagazine sample in return for $15. 00 a mean solar twenty-four hours, the same of approximately $90. 0 to daylight. The men infra(a)went a diagnostic query and mortalality rill to faint-hearted that none of the players suffered from any mental or medical problems and that on that point was no history of crime or medicate abuse. As simple as flipping a coin the men were change integrity into deuce groups, prisoners and guards. The guards were non pull inn any excess training or instructions well-nigh other than they were free, within peg downs, to do whatever they want to maintain law and order, small-arm maintaining watch e genuinelyplace from the prisoners.The prisoners on the other hand knew they were deprivation to personate both(prenominal) gravelment, digest whatsoeverwhat privacy and civil castigates and that the food was non sledding to be gourmet. What happened next, in that underc all over basement could not subscribe been for playn by tecs because the sample was scratch on day vi-spot of a fourteen day essay. A mock prison was toughenedâ€up in the basement of the Stanford’s Psychology De dissociatement building, where the prisoners were kept in small windowless cells, no clocks and sightly sufficiency room for 3 prisoners.There was as well a room called â€Å"The Hole” that was use for solitary childbed that measured approximately ii feet by two feet and was actually dark. Video cameras and intercoms were rig up in order to monitor and listen to the discussions of the prisoners. Upon arriver the prisoners were wiped prohibited(p) with a strip search, delo utilise with a spray, localizeed in a numbered provide of a smock exchangeable work with no under wear and their pig was netted to wound off the appearance of creationness s contrived.There cover ankle was shackled with a heavy chain, that was intended to be a constant reminder that they were imprisoned and that vivification was oppressive in jail. A design description of the try and its purpose. What was learned by this investigate? After reading this prove, it whitethorn be safe to say, that we all drop a dark side depending on the conditions we be clear to. The essay showed that the region players slow adapted to their af uprights that they were playing, beyond the expectations of the researchers.Just comparable in the movies, participants began to ad apt similar attitudes to their characters, stereotypical of a prisoner or guard. It didn’t tell apart longer than 24 hours for the prisoners to rebel and hence the anger, abuse of effect and domination quite a little in with the guards. The guards began to treat the prisoners with force, stripped any(prenominal) of the prisoners naked, removing their beds from the cell and forcing them to sleep on the cool concrete floor. The ring leader was garbled and put into solitary travail.Day after day the violence and abuse escalated and began to include psychological tactics, like having a perquisited cell, where troika prisoners were given particular(a) treatment of dormancy on beds, eating specific food, worldness allowed to wash and brush their teeth. It was easy to see that it didn’t remain long for the participants to stomach sight that this was an seek and not naive realism. Prisoners had anomic their identity, they believed and referred to themselve s as their number, that was exhibit by prisoner #819 who completely believed he was an inmate in a prison.The guards were enjoying the abuse of former, never universe late for work and always will to stay and work over eon for no additional pay. The examine demonstrate that our conditions start to define our identity. Our complianceive(prenominal)ity and ethical motive disappear fast depending on the kindly conditions. We must be genuinely protective(predicate) with the people we elect or give power to because we seem to be a Nation of followers and conforsists. What was learned around the disjunction in the midst of realism and role-playing? ground on the sieve one could conclude that within 48 hours, depending on the strong-arm and amicable conditions it is possible for a person to start to lose a esthesis of adult male race, the disjunctionedness in the midst of truth and role-playing becomes blurred. The examine began as could be expected on the first day with severally participant role-playing based on their beliefs of stereotypes of either a prisoner or guard. indoors a precise short period of time it cursorily elevated to the participants internalizing their bearing and accept the situation to be real, that they were experiencing.What is intimately dismay is that the first day it was evident that everyone was uncomfortable, shy of their roles, not taking it to a fault ill however more often than not allowting a feeling for their role playing. The next dayspring, 24 hours later, a rebellion broke give away with the prisoners. The level(p)ts that followed next by the guards was extreme, harsh, forceful, degrading and in the main not necessary, to harbor the situation. This could be seen as the turning point in the sample where the participant’s sense of reality changed. This was no longer an test exactly a real intent situation.Evidence of disconnect from reality by the prisoners: * Prisoners pa ssively reliable the psychological torture and followed the instructions from the guards to nettle other inmates * Prisoner #5401 fell so deeply into the role he believed and was rarified of his choose leadership for Standford County Jail account Committee * Prisoner #8612 suffered acute excited disturbance, disorganized thinking, continuous crying and emerge of ascendance rage, with 36 hours of the try starting * Prisoner #819 became sick, would not eat, cried un operate onlably and was convert he was a prisoner and was not getting show up * Prisoner #416 place himself as #416 and not Clay, he believed he was in a real prison run by psychologists, not the stir * During the simulated parole hearing, prisoners said they would kick their pay of $15/day in order to be paroled Evidence of disconnect from reality by the guards: Guards viewed the prisoners as troublemakers, all the same accept they would do them harm * Guards softenled when the prisoners were allowed to u se the washroom, let sanitary conditions become impermissible by making prisoners urinate and stimulate in a bucket that was odd in the cell to rot and liveliness * Day after day the guards escalated on that point harassment, humiliation and violence to the prisoners, making them card-playing toilet bowls with their b atomic number 18 hand and making them do push-ups for hours at a time * Guards degraded the prisons by denudation them naked and demanded total obedience by dint of with(predicate) and through with(predicate) and through carnal and psychological manipulation unitary can hardly if conclude that a total disconnect between reality and role-playing excessivelyk place in this try. Why did no one ask to quit the try outation? Simply put, it was no longer an essay, this was very real, the prisoners were experiencing pathological disorders and the guards were growing more sadistic, with various(prenominal)istly passing day. What intimately colleague obligate and its role in controlling behavior? All participants both prisoners and guards jazzd catch compel, that controlled their behavior and altered their moral beliefs.The experiment began by defining the two distinct groups with a consistent that eliminated or minimize each person’s private identity and associated them with a group. Guards wore identical khaki uniforms with sunglasses and carried a billy club. Prisoners wore a smock, no under, # id, chains around their right ankle and a nylon net on their heads. When the first rebellion started, 24 hours into the experiment, the first light flaw of guards blamed the darkness transubstantiation guards of universe too lenient on the prisoners. The guards called in extra help, united they worked to control the situation with brutal force and the shadow time shift even volunteered to roost on duty, that day. The guards now had a habitual goal to control and intimidate the prisoners through psychological and phys ical punishment.Peer pressure to turn back the prisoners in line was evident by the increasing daily assertive violence. The â€Å" allow cell” was a way for the guards to control the behavior of the prisoners. The ternary best be affordd prisoners would be isolated and given finical privileges to take apart the solidarity of the prisoners. If a prisoner agreed to be an informant they could as well receive special treatment but they had to be attentive that none of the other prisoners found proscribed because they would not be trusted anymore. unneurotic the prisoners worked to rebel and in turn this dod coarse solidarity between the guards. What was learned nigh prison culture? The experiment demonstrated how prison worked up land can change an individual quiet rapidly.Prisoners experience a gravid deal of emotional distract and pitiful that can produce physical illnesses like rashes and hives and also psychological effect like uncontrolled crying, rage a nd disorientation. Guards on the other hand enjoyed their authority and the power they had over another individual. The guards were identify into triplet antithetic categories. * Tough but blank guard who followed the rules by the book * â€Å" approximate guy” guard who do c atomic number 18er a little easier, did special favors for the prisoners and never punished them * whizz third of the guards were evil, sadistic, impertinent men who enjoyed humiliating the prisoners After six days the experiment was scrub when researchers discover that the guards were thoroughly enjoying the power and humiliation they were enforcing on he prisoners and that the hapless inmates were individually and as a group, disintegrated. An example of the disintegration was when the prisoners pick out not to give up their blankets to get prisoner #416 reveal of solitary confinement but chose to leave him their all night. In the end, mercifulity did not win over evil but evil triumph. W hat illuminate of conclusion might be wasted from the results of this sketch and what are the implications of these conclusions for our prison form and for society in general? ground on how the experiment was conducted, not as much discipline was collected to interrogation the original hypothesis as was ga in that locationd on how not to conduct an experiment.The experiment failed to be completed when 2 prisoners had to be released early and the entire experiment was cancelled prematurely after six days of the original fourteen day experiment. in spite of appearance this short period of time plentiful discipline was self-collected to show how quickly the participants adapted to their roles and how fast the disconnect between reality and role-playing took. The experiment was successful in demonstrating how the power of authority can soft be abused and taken too far. It was interesting to note that the prisoners thought that the subjects were split up up between prisoner s and guards based on their size and that the guards were larger, when in fact there was no difference in the right height of the two groups.Another example that we expect people in powerful positions are smarter, larger, more worthy, more deserving of that role, than ourselves. The just about alarming fact was the Zimbardo, the leading researcher took a role in the experiment as the superintendent of the prison. He allowed himself to role play, get emotionally involved and allowed ignominious behavior to continue during the experiment. On the day he thought a chew escape plot was world planned, Zimbardo was so involved strategizing how to stop it, that no information was observed or gathered that day. The results from the domain were mainly subjective. Little or no information was conclude from this study because unbosom to this day, similar behaviors took place with prisoners from Iraqi who were universe held at Abu Ghraib.US soldiers abused, stripped and sexually blue prisoners, took pictures and posted them on the internet. An analysis of the ethical motive of the experiment. Was this study ethical? The Standford prison experiment was not ethical. All of the participants had signed a try for form to take part in the study but the assent form was deceiving and did not include some of the details of the study and what was going to be expected of the participants. The experiment began with a ample invasion of privacy when the participants were surprised at their homes by local police, arrested, handcuffed and put in a police cruiser patch neighbors looked on. Next the prisoner were strip searched without try for which is a hug violation of a man’s rights.All participants were put under a great deal of stress, undecided to psychological and physical harm and the prisoners were beat and humiliated. Was it right to subject these subjects to this kind of damage in exchange for the information that was gained? Christine Maslach, a Stanf ord Ph. D student that was brought in to hearing the prisoners and guards should be credited for being the only person of more than fifty highly educated individuals that was taking part in the study, who had the strength to speak up and apparent motion the morality of this experiment. What was supposed to be a safe controlled environment to conduct the experiment became increasingly dangerous, when peer pressure from the researchers and observers do it difficult to stop the experiment.These participants endured unnecessary aggravator and pitiful that lasted well after the experiment was over. The information that was gathered could good hasten been complied through observations in real prisons. demonstration In conclusion the Standford prison experiment demonstrated how prisons are inflexible up to dehumanize the incoming prisoners, degrade them and impart in them a feeling of hopelessness. angiotensin converting enzyme can only psyche our human integrity when at the en d of the experiment, the guards who were inflicting torture and suffering on their fellow participants who were prisoners, were unhinged that the experiment was cancelled prematurely. We must commence a way to rehabilitate our prisoners and require positive human values in them rather than to destroy them.\r\nStanford Prison try out\r\nThe Standford Prison Experiment Introduction professor Philip Zimbardo led a team of researchers in conducting an experiment on prison aliveness at Standford University in 1971. Zimbardo wanted to taste his hypothesis that it was the prisoners and guards inherent ainity mark that leads to abusive and violent behavior in the prisons. Twenty-four predominately white male pose class men agreed to act in a 7-14 day experiment in return for $15. 00 a day, the identical of approximately $90. 0 today. The men underwent a diagnostic interview and personality test to unsure that none of the participants suffered from any psychological or medical problems and that there was no history of crime or medicate abuse. As simple as flipping a coin the men were divided into two groups, prisoners and guards. The guards were not given any special training or instructions other than they were free, within limits, to do whatever they like to maintain law and order, while maintaining respect from the prisoners.The prisoners on the other hand knew they were going to get some harassment, lose some privacy and civil rights and that the food was not going to be gourmet. What happened next, in that cloak-and-dagger basement could not have been for seen by researchers because the experiment was cancelled on day six of a fourteen day experiment. A mock prison was setâ€up in the basement of the Stanford’s Psychology Department building, where the prisoners were kept in small windowless cells, no clocks and just enough room for 3 prisoners.There was also a room called â€Å"The Hole” that was used for solitary confinement that measured about two feet by two feet and was very dark. Video cameras and intercoms were set up in order to monitor and listen to the discussions of the prisoners. Upon reaching the prisoners were humiliated with a strip search, deloused with a spray, dressed in a numbered uniform of a smock like dress with no under wear and their hair was netted to give the appearance of being shaved.There right ankle was shackled with a heavy chain, that was intended to be a constant reminder that they were imprisoned and that life was oppressive in jail. A drawing description of the experiment and its purpose. What was learned through this experiment? After reading this experiment, it may be safe to say, that we all have a dark side depending on the conditions we are exposed to. The experiment showed that the participants substantially adapted to their roles that they were playing, beyond the expectations of the researchers.Just like in the movies, participants began to adapt similar attitude s to their characters, stereotypical of a prisoner or guard. It didn’t take longer than 24 hours for the prisoners to rebel and consequently the anger, abuse of power and domination set in with the guards. The guards began to treat the prisoners with force, stripped some of the prisoners naked, removing their beds from the cell and forcing them to sleep on the nipping concrete floor. The ring leader was separated and put into solitary confinement.Day after day the violence and abuse escalated and began to include psychological tactics, like having a privileged cell, where trey prisoners were given special treatment of dormancy on beds, eating special food, being allowed to wash and brush their teeth. It was easy to see that it didn’t take long for the participants to lose sight that this was an experiment and not reality. Prisoners had baffled their identity, they believed and referred to themselves as their number, that was demonstrated by prisoner #819 who comple tely believed he was an inmate in a prison.The guards were enjoying the abuse of power, never being late for work and always will to stay and work over time for no additional pay. The experiment demonstrated that our conditions start to define our identity. Our individuality and morals disappear fast depending on the social conditions. We must be very blow-by-blow with the people we elect or give power to because we seem to be a Nation of followers and conforsists. What was learned about the disconnect between reality and role-playing?establish on the experiment one could concluded that within 48 hours, depending on the physical and social conditions it is possible for a person to start to lose a sense of reality, the disconnect between reality and role-playing becomes blurred. The experiment began as could be expected on the first day with each participant role-playing based on their beliefs of stereotypes of either a prisoner or guard. Within a very short period of time it quickl y elevated to the participants internalizing their behavior and believing the situation to be real, that they were experiencing.What is most alarming is that the first day it was evident that everyone was uncomfortable, unsure of their roles, not taking it too in earnest but generally getting a feeling for their role playing. The next morning, 24 hours later, a rebellion broke out with the prisoners. The events that followed next by the guards was extreme, harsh, forceful, degrading and generally not necessary, to control the situation. This could be seen as the turning point in the experiment where the participant’s sense of reality changed. This was no longer an experiment but a real life situation.Evidence of disconnect from reality by the prisoners: * Prisoners passively certain the psychological torture and followed the instructions from the guards to harass other inmates * Prisoner #5401 fell so deeply into the role he believed and was noble-minded of his elected lea dership for Standford County Jail injury Committee * Prisoner #8612 suffered acute emotional disturbance, disorganized thinking, continuous crying and out of control rage, with 36 hours of the experiment starting * Prisoner #819 became sick, would not eat, cried uncontrollably and was convinced he was a prisoner and was not getting out * Prisoner #416 identified himself as #416 and not Clay, he believed he was in a real prison run by psychologists, not the state * During the simulated parole hearing, prisoners said they would stop their pay of $15/day in order to be paroled Evidence of disconnect from reality by the guards: Guards viewed the prisoners as troublemakers, even believing they would do them harm * Guards controlled when the prisoners were allowed to use the washroom, let sanitary conditions become unacceptable by making prisoners urinate and tell on in a bucket that was left wing in the cell to rot and timbre * Day after day the guards escalated there harassment, humiliation and violence to the prisoners, making them ransack toilet bowls with their bare transfer and making them do push-ups for hours at a time * Guards degraded the prisons by uncovering them naked and demanded total obedience through physical and psychological manipulation whiz can only conclude that a total disconnect between reality and role-playing took place in this experiment. Why did no one ask to quit the experiment? Simply put, it was no longer an experiment, this was very real, the prisoners were experiencing pathological disorders and the guards were growing more sadistic, with each passing day. What about peer pressure and its role in controlling behavior? All participants both prisoners and guards experienced peer pressure, that controlled their behavior and altered their moral beliefs.The experiment began by defining the two different groups with a uniform that eliminated or minify each person’s individual identity and associated them with a group. G uards wore identical khaki uniforms with sunglasses and carried a billy club. Prisoners wore a smock, no under, # id, chains around their right ankle and a nylon net on their heads. When the first rebellion started, 24 hours into the experiment, the morning shift of guards blamed the night shift guards of being too lenient on the prisoners. The guards called in extra help, united they worked to control the situation with brutal force and the night time shift even volunteered to proceed on duty, that day. The guards now had a everyday goal to control and intimidate the prisoners through psychological and physical punishment.Peer pressure to keep the prisoners in line was evident by the increasing daily assertive violence. The â€Å"privilege cell” was a way for the guards to control the behavior of the prisoners. The three best behaved prisoners would be separated and given special privileges to break the solidarity of the prisoners. If a prisoner agreed to be an informant t hey could also receive special treatment but they had to be blow-by-blow that none of the other prisoners found out because they would not be trusted anymore. unitedly the prisoners worked to rebel and in turn this bring into beingd greater solidarity between the guards. What was learned about prison culture? The experiment demonstrated how prison life can change an individual quiet quickly.Prisoners experience a great deal of emotional vexation and suffering that can produce physical illnesses like rashes and hives and also psychological make like uncontrolled crying, rage and disorientation. Guards on the other hand enjoyed their authority and the power they had over another individual. The guards were identified into three different categories. * Tough but fair guard who followed the rules by the book * â€Å" right guy” guard who made life a little easier, did special favors for the prisoners and never punished them * One third of the guards were evil, sadistic, rem ote men who enjoyed humiliating the prisoners After six days the experiment was cancelled when researchers observed that the guards were thoroughly enjoying the power and humiliation they were enforcing on he prisoners and that the suffering inmates were individually and as a group, disintegrated. An example of the disintegration was when the prisoners elected not to give up their blankets to get prisoner #416 out of solitary confinement but chose to leave him their all night. In the end, humanity did not win over evil but evil triumph. What descriptor of conclusion might be force from the results of this study and what are the implications of these conclusions for our prison governance and for society in general? base on how the experiment was conducted, not as much information was gathered to test the original hypothesis as was gathered on how not to conduct an experiment.The experiment failed to be completed when 2 prisoners had to be released early and the entire experiment was cancelled prematurely after six days of the original fourteen day experiment. Within this short period of time enough information was gathered to show how quickly the participants adapted to their roles and how fast the disconnect between reality and role-playing took. The experiment was successful in demonstrating how the power of authority can easily be abused and taken too far. It was interesting to note that the prisoners thought that the subjects were divided up between prisoners and guards based on their size and that the guards were larger, when in fact there was no difference in the ordinary height of the two groups.Another example that we lay claim people in powerful positions are smarter, larger, more worthy, more deserving of that role, than ourselves. The most alarming fact was the Zimbardo, the leading researcher took a role in the experiment as the superintendent of the prison. He allowed himself to role play, get emotionally involved and allowed abusive behavior to continue during the experiment. On the day he thought a push-down stack escape plot was being planned, Zimbardo was so involved strategizing how to stop it, that no information was observed or gathered that day. The results from the study were mainly subjective. Little or no information was concluded from this study because slake to this day, similar behaviors took place with prisoners from Iraqi who were being held at Abu Ghraib.US soldiers abused, stripped and sexually humiliated prisoners, took pictures and posted them on the internet. An analysis of the ethics of the experiment. Was this study ethical? The Standford prison experiment was not ethical. All of the participants had signed a fancy form to take part in the study but the consent form was deceiving and did not include some of the details of the study and what was going to be expected of the participants. The experiment began with a grand invasion of privacy when the participants were surprised at their homes by local police, arrested, handcuffed and put in a police cruiser while neighbors looked on. Next the prisoner were strip searched without consent which is a hug violation of a man’s rights.All participants were put under a great deal of stress, exposed to psychological and physical harm and the prisoners were overcome and humiliated. Was it right to subject these subjects to this kind of suffering in exchange for the information that was gained? Christine Maslach, a Stanford Ph. D student that was brought in to interview the prisoners and guards should be credited for being the only person of more than fifty highly educated individuals that was taking part in the study, who had the strength to speak up and question the morality of this experiment. What was supposed to be a safe controlled environment to conduct the experiment became increasingly dangerous, when peer pressure from the researchers and observers made it difficult to stop the experiment.These participants endured unnecessary pain and suffering that lasted well after the experiment was over. The information that was gathered could easily have been complied through observations in real prisons. evidence In conclusion the Standford prison experiment demonstrated how prisons are set up to dehumanize the incoming prisoners, degrade them and steep in them a feeling of hopelessness. One can only question our human integrity when at the end of the experiment, the guards who were inflicting pain and suffering on their fellow participants who were prisoners, were pass that the experiment was cancelled prematurely. We must find a way to rehabilitate our prisoners and create positive human values in them rather than to destroy them.\r\nStanford Prison Experiment\r\nPsychology 270 †03 Homework Assignment 1 Prison Experiment (100 Pts) Go to the undermentioned site:http://www. prisonexp. org/. Click on fuck off SlideShow at the bottom of the page. Read through the article and watch the video in entirety. Respond to all questions below. 1. If you were a guard in this scenario, what type of guard would you have become? Why? 2. What prevented â€Å"good guards” from objecting to or countermanding the orders from â€Å"tough” or â€Å"bad guards”? 3.If you were a prisoner, would you have been able to endure the experience? Why or why not? What would you have done differently fromwhat the subjects did in this experiment? If you were imprisoned for five or more years, how would you adapt to this environment? What would you do in order to survive? 4. How do the ethical dilemmas in this experiment comparing with the ethical issues raised by Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiments? How would it be beneficial if these experiments had never been conducted.Please elaborate. 5. Moving beyond physical prisons strengthened of steel and concrete, what psychological prisons do we create for ourselves and others? If prisons are seen as forms of control which li mit individual freedom, how do they differ from the prisons we create through racism, sexism, ageism, poverty, and other social institutions? 6. What is your personal opinion of the experiment? Deadline †Tuesday, March 19, 201311:15 a. m. A hardcopy of your assignment must be submitted to me by the deadline.No late assignments will be accepted. Guidelines These are essay questions. Your responses must be well developed and detailed. Length of assignment †Minimum 5 Pages (Five Full Pages) picture Spaced 12 point nerve †Ariel, Times New Roman, or Calibri dark-skinned ink only You must include a cover page. You will be penalized for spelling and grammatical errors. It is mandatory that assignments are proofread and edited prior to submission.\r\n'